thắc mắc Trong 1 tháng có thể sửa hết GR của Speaking và writing k

Status
Not open for further replies.

NoNameMuon

Member
e sắp thi r em panic quá, liệu 1 tháng em viết liên tục, nhờ chatgpt sửa liệu có thể flawless về GR k
 
Góp ý (ko liên quan gì tới anh văn nhé):
Diễn đạt nội dung bằng tiếng Việt của bác: còn khó hiểu, viết vội vàng, ẩu tả, có lúc lủng củng, thiếu mạch lạc, ko diễn đạt được nội dung bác cần truyền tải, trình bày nội dung rời rạc, ko theo hệ thống gì cả; sai ngữ pháp (chỉ nói tới viết hoa và dấu câu thôi) thì việc bác muốn flawless về GRAMMAR là ko thực hiện được (do thói quen 'quen sai' ngữ pháp rồi).
 
e sắp thi r em panic quá, liệu 1 tháng em viết liên tục, nhờ chatgpt sửa liệu có thể flawless về GR k
Về Writing thì có. Sách Grammar in Use có 142 units thôi, mà nhiều units là bạn cũng biết rồi, mỗi ngày master 3 units là thừa sức.

Với mục tiêu overall 6.0, bạn chỉ cần sửa hết các lỗi ngữ pháp ở trình độ B2 trở xuống (quyển Grammar in Use màu xanh dương), còn các lỗi ngữ pháp nâng cao thì bạn không cần sửa cũng không sao.
 
Có. Sách Grammar in Use có 142 units thôi, mà nhiều units là bạn cũng biết rồi, mỗi ngày master 3 units là thừa sức.

Với mục tiêu overall 6.0, bạn chỉ cần sửa hết các lỗi ngữ pháp ở trình độ B2 trở xuống (quyển Grammar in Use màu xanh dương), còn các lỗi ngữ pháp nâng cao thì bạn không cần sửa cũng không sao.
em nhờ luôn chatgpt + sashc đc k ạ
 
Phải học theo sách. ChatGPT chỉ có thể sửa được những lỗi bạn đã viết rồi, nhưng nó không thể biết tương lai bạn có thể mắc lỗi gì.
em thì quanh đi quẩn lại đâu đó chục câu thôi bác chứ em có bao giờ tự nghĩ idea mới đâu, bác mà đọc bài em 10 bài bác suy ra pattern của em ngay
 
The arid nature of land, which would be conducive to mass wildfires, coupled with deforestation, would drive wild animals to the verge/ brink of extinction => As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
 
The arid nature of land, which would be conducive to mass wildfires, coupled with deforestation, would drive wild animals to the verge/ brink of extinction => As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
 
The arid nature of land, which would be conducive to mass wildfires, coupled with deforestation, would drive wild animals to the verge/ brink of extinction => As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
 
The arid nature of land, which would be conducive to mass wildfires, coupled with deforestation, would drive wild animals to the verge/ brink of extinction => As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
 
The arid nature of land, which would be conducive to mass wildfires, coupled with deforestation, would drive wild animals to the verge/ brink of extinction => As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
 
The arid nature of land, which would be conducive to mass wildfires, coupled with deforestation, would drive wild animals to the verge/ brink of extinction => As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
 
As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
We would sustain terrible damage in the event of floods, due to the absence of forests as our defense.
 
As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
We would sustain terrible damage in the event of floods, due to the absence of forests as our defense.
 
As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
We would sustain terrible damage in the event of floods, due to the absence of forests as our defense.
 
As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
We would sustain terrible damage in the event of floods, due to the absence of forests as our defense.
 
As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
We would sustain terrible damage in the event of floods, due to the absence of forests as our defense.
 
As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
We would sustain terrible damage in the event of floods, due to the absence of forests as our defense.
 
As a knock-on effect on the food chain, the dying out of a species would trigger the disappearance of other species => Humans would lose great sources of food.
We would sustain terrible damage in the event of floods, due to the absence of forests as our defense.
 
Climate change:
Effects:
The rise in the global temperature would give rise to the melting of icebergs, which leads to the rise in sea levels. As the sea creeps up, floods are occurring with greater regularity.
=> An immediate impact of this would be damage to coastal communities/ fishery villages: they would have to leave their material possessions and flee/ evacuate to higher grounds, hence losses of property/ assets and livelihood
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top